
The "cocktail party effect" in normal-hearing adults:
We are investigating people's ability to understand speech and to
ignore other competing or distracting sounds, such as noise or other
voices. We are specifically interested in the extent to which speech
intelligibility improves when the target sound and competing sounds are
spatially separated, the auditory cues that contribute to this benefit,
and the extent to which echoes interfere with this improvement.
The "precedence
effect" and echo suppression. In a reverberant environment,
sounds reach the ears through several paths. Although the direct sound
is followed by multiple reflections, which would be audible in
isolation, the first-arriving sound is treated with greater “weight” by
the auditory system, and therefore dominates many aspects of
perception. The ‘‘precedence effect’’ refers to perceptual phenomena
that are thought to be involved in resolving competition for perception
and localization between a direct sound and a reflection. We are
studying these phenomena in normal-hearing people in the hopes of
better understanding how the brain suppresses echoes and enables
listeners to function in reverberant environments.
Bilateral cochlear implants: In recent years there has been tremendous
success with the restoration of hearing to deaf individuals through the implantation of
cochlear implants. However, most implant users complain of having difficulty hearing in
noisy environments. We are investigating the extent to which having a second implant,
hence bilateral hearing, will provide the necessary benefit to enable implant users to
overcome trouble in realistic auditory environments. We are studying how bilateral implants
affect sound localization and speech understanding in noise. In addition, in collaboration with
Dr. Richard Van Hoesel from the CRC in Melbourne,
we are using direct stimulation of electrode pairs in the two ears we are investigating the ability of
the listeners to process binaural stimuli. The effect of age at which adults acquired deafness turns out
to be an important predictor of their ability to use binaural stimuli. In
addition, we are investigating the importance of the rate of stimulation
and electrode interactions.
(see our
recent conference presentations).
Cochlear
implant simulations of speech signals: We are simulating
listening through cochlear implants to study how normal hearing people
cope with reduced number of auditory channels and various speech
processing strategies, especially in the presence of noise. This work
is being conducted in collaboration with Dr. Fan-Gang Zeng
at U.C. Irvine.
Speech intelligibility in noisy and reverberant
environments: Young children spend a majority of their time
in noisy environments, where they must cope with constant competition
between the target voice (such as a teacher in a classroom) and noise
or other children talking. Some children cope with this challenge
better than others. We are attempting to understand how the auditory
system of young children processes multiple signals and which auditory
cues are most effective in providing improved speech understanding. CRISP
(children’s realistic index of speech perception) is our new
assessment tool for obtaining these measures. It enables the
presentation of target words in the presence of various types of
competing sounds whose locations can be varied relative to the child’s
head. This test comes in both computer-game and manual versions that
can be purchased from the lab (contact Litovsky@waisman.wisc.edu).
Directional
hearing: We are assessing how well children can localize
sounds in the environment. We know from our previous work that they are
worse than adults at suppressing echoes. Now, we are interested in
knowing more about how they integrate information about the location
and content of sounds. How do they solve the problem of "what" is the
signal and "where" is it coming from?
Bilateral
cochlear implants: The majority of children with implants
world-wide have a single device. While there is a growing number of
children with bilateral implants, the benefits of 2 vs. 1 must be
documented. In our lab we are studying the effects of bilateral
implants on the ability of children to hear speech in noise (or
two-talker babble), and to localize sounds. To date, we have studied
over 20 children, the majority are recipients of Nucleus-24 devices,
and smaller numbers have either the MedEl or Clarion devices. We focus
on tracking their performance during the first 2 years after receiving
the second CI. To date, several of the children have reached the
24-month milestone. Nearly all children have been showing improved
performance on speech understanding in noise under bilateral conditions
compared with unilateral listening modes. The improvement is measurable
within a few months of bilateral hearing. Sound localization abilities,
which are rather poor at 3- and 9-months, begin to improve at 15-months
or longer following the onset of bilateral hearing. Children with
bilateral hearing aids, and with CI+HA have also been participating in
this research. From this work we hope to better understand the relative
benefits of unilateral and bilateral amplification and implantation,
and the impact of each approach on children's ability understand speech
and to localize sounds in their environments.
The first two publications from this work are
in the journal Ear and Hearing and International Journal of Audiology,
and can be found at
http://www.waisman.wisc.edu:8000/bhl/publications.htm. For further information please
contact Ruth Litovsky.
Adults with normal hearing are recruited continuously and paid on an
hourly basis. Young children receive toys and stickers or can also be
paid, depending on parental preference.
Adults and
children with hearing aids or cochlear implants:
Many participants live outside of the state of WI. If you
are interested in participating we have the funds to pay for travel
costs from within the USA.
For all
questions regarding subject participating please contact us: godar@waisman.wisc.edu.
(608) 262-7483