The goal of these “Guidelines for Best Practices in Determining Eligibility Based on Children’s Cognitive Development" is to offer support to the evaluation team in their decision-making regarding a child’s eligibility for early intervention services based on cognitive development.
(See pages 21-24 for Procedures for Initial Evaluation.)
In Wisconsin, cognitive
is defined in HFS 90 [HFS 90.08 (7)(c)1] as follows:
Cognitive Development, as evidenced by play skills, manipulation of toys,
sensorimotor schemes, attention, perceptual skills, memory, problem solving
and reasoning.
Preface
Cognitive development focuses on how children learn and process information. Young children initially learn about the world through active, physical exploration and through their experiences. They use all their senses (touch, movement, smell, taste, vision, and hearing) to gather information about their world. Gradually, children learn to think symbolically and logically about their experiences. Cognitive development occurs as children explore and test a variety of ideas and newly learned concepts. As evaluators, it is important to assess the child’s ability to organize and make sense of the environment to which he or she is exposed (Rossetti, 1990). Play, social interactions with parents, family members and caregivers, and exploration of their physical environment are children’s first learning experiences. Cognitive development is intertwined with all other areas of development. Consider the following tasks: Putting objects in a container not only requires eye-hand coordination, but also requires the ability to move from the idea of taking things out of a container to putting them back in. Putting items on a string is a fine motor task as well as a problem-solving task. The child’s pleasure and motivation increase the likelihood of completing and repeating the tasks.
The understanding of language and the ability to use language are also all related to one’s cognitive ability. A child’s ability to connect to people and objects in his environment allows him to place meaning to his experiences. A child’s ability to perform various cognitive tasks is dependent on his or her motor, social, and language skills.
Theories of Cognitive Development
PIAGET’S STAGES OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development is one of the most quoted theories describing the stages of cognitive development. (Atherton, 2003) Many evaluation tools are reflective of his findings. The stages of intellectual development formulated by Piaget appear to be related to major developments in brain growth. (Myers, 2004)
Recent research has found that infants anticipate events, actively search for hidden objects, flexibly vary their sensorimotor schemes, and engage in make-believe play within Piaget’s time frame. (Berk, 2003) Yet other capacities, including secondary circular reactions, the emergence of object permanence, deferred imitation, categorization, and analogical problem-solving, seem to show themselves sooner than Piaget expected. (Berk).
Below are listed Piaget’s stages of development for the ages birth to three:
Adapted from childdevelopmentinfo.com
Another model in which to view infant-toddler cognition was presented by McCall (1979). In this model performance is thought to change as various stages of cognitive development are reached. This model is similar to Piaget’s and is also broken into stages.
MC CALL’S STAGES OF MENTAL PERFORMANCE
Adapted from Rossetti, 1990, Infant-Toddler Assessment
When examining the evolution and history of cognition there are two additional theories that should be noted: the Core Knowledge Perspective, and Sociocultural Theory.
CORE KNOWLEDGE PERSPECTIVE
According to the Core Knowledge Perspective, infants begin life with innate special-purpose knowledge systems, or core domains of thought, each of which permits a ready grasp of new, related information and therefore supports early, rapid development of certain aspects of cognition (Berk). According to Berk, each core domain has a long evolutionary history, is essential for survival, and develops independently, resulting in uneven, domain-specific changes. Reviews of the accuracy of the Core Knowledge Perspective are mixed.
SOCIOCULURAL THEORY
Piaget’s theory, McCall’s stages, and the Core Knowledge Perspective emphasize the biological side of cognitive development. These theories represent the child himself as the most important source when developing cognition. Lev Vygotsky believed that children are active seekers of knowledge, but he did not view them as solitary agents. In his theory, rich social and cultural contexts strongly impact cognitive development (Berk). He coined the label “zone of proximal development,” during which a knowledgeable adult or even a proficient child supports the child only as much as necessary in order for that child to display an emerging behavior. This type of scaffolding results in one ascertaining what kind of supports would be needed for a child to display a skill independently.
Vygotsky believed that children speak to themselves for self-guidance and self-direction. His approach included the influence of significant people in a child’s life. He viewed language as the foundation for all higher cognitive processes, including, controlled attention, memorization, and planning. As children get older and tasks become easier, their self-directed speech declines and is internalized as silent inner speech. According to Vygotsky, language development broadens preschoolers’ participation in dialogues with more knowledgeable individuals, who encourage them to master culturally important tasks (Berk). Limitations of Vygotsky’s theory are thought to be that verbal dialogues are not the only means, or even the most important means through which children learn in some cultures, and that little is said about biological contributions of children’s cognition. (Berk)
General Recommendations for Evaluation of Cognitive Development to Determine Eligibility for the Birth to 3 Program
If cognitive development is an area of concern, a teacher should be a member of the team. If a teacher is not on the team one member must have expertise in evaluation of both typical and atypical development and program planning. [HFS 90.08 (3)(a)] (See pages 20-24 in the Introduction Section for procedures for initial evaluation.)
In the evaluation of cognitive skills consider the following components:
Typical Developmental Milestones
Just as one must examine a variety of theories of development and combine components of each to gain a comprehensive and holistic view of the process of the cognitive development of the child, one must also consider various resources when viewing developmental milestones. Three sources of developmental milestone lists are displayed in Appendices 2, 3, and 4 to show differences in perspective and emphasis when using various sources and skill classifications. Milestones only represent overall age trends. Individual differences exist in the precise age at which each milestone is attained. All children do not exhibit all the milestones. Each milestone must be considered as part of the process of development and progression along a continuum of cognitive growth.
The chart of evaluation tools (Appendix 1) lists instruments that reflect different aspects of cognitive development. Appropriate tools should be chosen on an individual basis to address the particular child and the area in question.
MODIFICATIONS AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
By using clinical observation and making modifications or adaptations to learn about how the child learns or is best able to interact and gain meaning from his environment we gain a better chance of identifying future learning challenges. When evaluating the aforementioned components of cognitive development and the milestones that follow, it is essential to look beyond the basic skill or task that is being evaluated. In order to gain an accurate and beneficial assessment of the child it is critical that the evaluator considers various factors that may impact the child’s performance and make any needed modifications that may assist the child in completing the requested task. Clinical observation will assist in providing an accurate reflection of the child’s abilities. Observations and modifications must be noted in your evaluation reports. Alterations to the evaluation tool must be noted, and scoring completed according to test protocol.
During the initial contact with the family it will be important to learn if there are any factors that may impact the child’s ability to complete various evaluation components. Is there a vision, hearing, mobility, language or social/emotional conditions that may impact the child’s performance? When factors are identified, it is essential that modifications be made during the evaluation so the child is able to successfully complete the required tasks. Be sure the child is positioned so he can manipulate and see evaluation items. If a child has an expressive language delay offer responses by providing objects/pictures to choose from. If a condition is identified it may impact the evaluation tool that is used. Appendix 1 provides a variety of evaluation tools to choose from.
When the child’s attention or sensory processing system is found to impact the child’s performance once the evaluation process has begun, modifications can be made during the evaluation. Environmental modifications can be helpful when a child is seen to have difficulty processing or attending to the information provided. Experiment with removing and limiting stimuli and objects, moving the evaluation to a smaller space or table, changing your proximity to the child by moving closer or further away, lowering or softening your voice or singing, using familiar or comforting toys, providing time for the child to process and then respond to request, or using gestures or visual cues.
Observing how the child completes a task or request is helpful. Is the child only able to complete the task when modifications or prompting is provided? After the task has been modeled one time or several? Is lots of reinforcement and encouragement needed? Is the child able to generalize the skill? Observe the child’s learning style. Does he learn visually, tacitly, through movement, by being an observer or by doing? Does the child connect meaningful to the idea or is there a rote learned response? Can the child form ideas during play? Is the child’s response purposeful?
Identifying learning challenges in the early years of life are based on clinical observation and the emerging research on the developmental pathways involved in early learning and eventual mastery of reading, math, writing and organizing (Diagnostic Manual for Infancy and Early Childhood (2005). “These early learning challenges involve emotional and social capacities, auditory processing and language (including memory and retrieval), visuo-sptatial processing, perceptual motor and motor planning (including visual memory, sequencing, and what is often referred to as nonverbal learning) capacities and sensory modulation.” (ICDL-DMIC pg. 168).
Each of these individual areas, intertwined or separate, are the building blocks to successful learning. The Diagnostic Manual for Infancy and Early Childhood (2005) developed by the Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning Disorders, defines and identifies learning challenges. Compromises in functional emotional developmental capacities, auditory processing and language, visuo-spatial capacities, regulatory-sensory processing patterns, or a combination of these have an impact on the Emerging Learning Challenges of reading and language arts, math, reading comprehension, written communication, and in organizing capacities (executive function)
By considering these factors during evaluation and assessment activities, we can inform the eligibility decision making process. We will prevent future difficulties for children if we are able to identify the specific areas they are having difficulty with in infancy and childhood and support them to obtain or have successful interactions with their environment so future learning difficulties are lessened or eliminated.
Patterns are identified in Appendix 5. These tables are meant as guidelines and should not be used as diagnostic tools unless you are trained or certified in that area.
References
Atherton, J. S. (2003) Learning and Teaching: Piaget's developmental psychology [On-line] UK: Available: http://www.dmu.ac.uk/~jamesa/learning/piaget.html.
Berk, L. (2003) Child Development, Sixth Edition, Allyn & Bacon.
Bradley, R.H. & Caldwell, B.M. (1979). Home observation for measurement of the environment: A revision of the preschool scale. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 235-244.
Bricker, D et al., (1993) Assessment, Evaluation, and Programming System for Infants and Children, Birth to Three Measurement, Volume 1. (AEPS). Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning (2005) The Diagnostic Manual for Infancy and Early Childhood
Kusmierek, A., et al (1995). Birth to Three Sequenced Team Assessment Resource, The Family Enrichment Program, Riverdale, IL.
Linder, T (1993) Transdisciplinary Play-Based Assessment (TPBA), Revised Edition, Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
McCall, R. (1979). The development of intellectual function in infancy and the prediction of later I.Q. In J. Osofsky (Ed.) Handbook of infant development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Myers, Robert (Editor). (2004) Stages of Intellectual Development in Children and Teenagers. Child Development Institute [Online]. Available: http://www.childdevelopmentinfo.com/development/piaget.shtml.
Newborg, J. (2004). Battelle Developmental Inventory, Second Edition, Riverside Publishing, Itasca, IL.
Rossetti, L., (1990). Infant-Toddler Assessment, Boston: Little, Brown.
| Tool | Comments | Authors | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Clinical and Educational Manual for Use with the Uzgiris & Hunt scales of Infant Psychological Development | Standardized | Carl Dunst, 1980 | Pro-Ed; Austin, TX |
| Assessment, Evaluation, and Programming System for Infants and Children, Birth to Three Measurement, Vol. 1. (AEPS). | Criterion-referenced | Bricker, Bricker and Pretti-Frontczak, 1993 | Paul H Brookes Publishing |
| Battelle Developmental Inventory, Second Edition | Norm-referenced Birth – 8 | Jean Newborg, 2004 | The Riverside Publishing Company |
| Bayley Scales of Infant Development | Norm-referenced | Nancy Bayley, 1993. | The Psychological Corporation |
| Carolina Assessment for Infants and Toddlers with Special Needs second edition | Criterion-referenced | Johnson-Martin, Jens, Attermeier & Hacker, 1991. | Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company |
| Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC) | Norm referenced | J. K. Voress and T. Maddox, 1998 | Pro-Ed; Austin, TX |
| Developmental Profile II (DPII) | Norm-referenced Infancy to 9 ½ years | Alpern G, Boll T, Shearer M., 1986. | Western Psychological Services |
| Early Intervention Developmental Profile | Criterion-referenced | Rogers, et.al.,1981 | University of Michigan Press |
| Early Learning Accomplishment Profile for Young Children. | Criterion-referenced | 1995 | Kaplan Early Learning Company |
| Hawaii Early Learning Profile (HELP) | Criterion-referenced | Furano, et. al., 1994. | VORT Corporation |
| Infant-Preschool Play Assessment Profile | Criterion-referenced | Sally L. Flagler, 1996 | Kaplan Early Learning Company |
| Infant-Toddler Developmental Assessment (IDA) | Norm-referenced | Sally Provence, Joanna Erikson, Susan Vater, and Saro Palmeri, 1995 | The Riverside Publishing Company. |
| McCarthy Scale of Children’s Abilities | Norm-referenced | Dorothea McCarthy, 1972. | The Psychological Corporation |
| Minnesota Child Development Inventory | Norm-referenced | Harold R. Ireton, 1992. | Behavior Sciences Systems, Inc. |
| Mullen Scales | Norm-referenced | Ellen M. Mullen, 1995. | American Guidance Services, Inc. |
| Transdisciplinary Play-Based Assessment (TPBA) | Criterion-referenced | Toni W. Lindner, 1993. | Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company |
CATEGORIES OF PLAY
| Age attained | Milestones |
|---|---|
| 0-24 months | Exploratory of sensorimotor play |
| 9-24 months | Relational or functional play (predominates from 15-21 months) |
| 24 months+ | Constructive play (predominates from 36 months on) |
| 21-72 months | Representational/symbolic play |
| 36 months+ | Rough and tumble play |
EARLY OBJECT USE
| Age attained | Milestones |
|---|---|
| 3-6 months | Focus on action performed by objects (banging, shaking) |
| 6-9 months | Begins to explore characteristics of objects; range of schemes expand (e.g. pulling, turning, poking, tearing) |
| 8-9 months | Begins to combine objects, relational play (e.g. objects in container) |
| 9-12 months | Begins to see the relation between complex actions and consequences (opening doors, putting on lids) |
| 12 months+ | Acts on objects using a variety of schemes |
| 12-15 months | Links schemes in simple combinations into a meaningful sequence (puts person in car and pushes car) |
| 24-36 months | Links multischeme combinations into a meaningful sequence (puts paste on toothbrush, puts cap on tube, brushes baby’s teeth |
| 36-42 months | Links schemes into complex script |
SYMBOLIC AND REPRESENTATIONAL SKILLS
| Age attained | Milestones |
|---|---|
| 12-16 months | Simple pretend play directed toward self (eating, sleeping) |
| 12-18 months | Can focus pretend play on animate and inanimate objects and others; combines simple schemes in action out familiar activity |
| 18-24 months | Increased use of nonrealistic objects in pretending (similar to real); can have inanimate objects perform actions (doll washes self) |
| 24-36 months | Can use more abstract representation of object in play; uses multischeme combinations (feed doll with bottle, pat it on back, put it to bed) |
| 36-48 months | Plans out pretend situations in advance, organizing who and what are needed for role-play; events in play are sequenced into scenario that tells story |
| 36-42 months | Can use imaginary objects in play; acts out sequences with miniature dolls (in house, garage, airport, etc) |
IMITATION SKILLS
| Age attained | Milestones |
|---|---|
| 4-8 months | Imitates vocalizations and actions that are part of his or her repertoire |
| 6-9 months | Imitates actions he or she can see performed that are in his or her repertoire |
| 8-12 months | Imitates sounds and gestures not part of his or repertoire |
| 9-12 months | Imitates unseen patterns composed of familiar actions |
| 12-15 months | Imitates novel movements |
| 12-18 months | Immediate imitation of a model |
| 15-18 months | Imitates drawing of a stroke |
| 18-24 months Recognizes ways to activate toys in imitation of adult; Deferred imitation | |
| 21-24 months | Varies own imitation creatively from that of model |
| 27-30 months | Imitates drawing of face |
| 36-60 months | Demonstrates increasingly complex role imitation |
PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS
| Age attained | Milestones |
|---|---|
| 6-9 months | Finds object after watching it disappear; Uses movement as a means to attain an end; Anticipates movement of objects in space; Attends to environmental consequences of actions; Repeats actions in order to repeat consequences |
| 9-12 months | Demonstrates tool use after demonstration; Uses goal-directed behavior; Performs an action in order to produce result |
| 12-15 months | Uses an adult to achieve a goal; Attempts to activate simple mechanisms; Rotates and examines three dimensional aspects of an object; Uses nonsystematic trial-anderror problem solving |
| 18-21 months | Attends to shapes of things and uses appropriately; Uses some foresight before acting; uses tool to obtain a desired object; invents means to attain a goal through thought processes rather then just trial and error; Operates a mechanical toy; Can foresee effects or infer causes |
| 24-27 months | Discriminates sizes |
| 24-30 months | Can build with blocks horizontally and vertically |
| 27-30 months | Relates one experience to another, using logic and knowledge of previous experiences; Can plan actions in his or her mind without acting them out; Can relate one experience to another using “if…then” logic |
| 36-48 months | Can build vertical block structure requiring balance and coordination (9 blocks); Can put graduated sizes in order; Uses representational thinking in constructions |
DISCRIMINATION/CLASSIFICATION SKILLS
| Age attained | Milestones |
|---|---|
| 2-6 months | Growing sense of difference between self and mother and mothers of others |
| 6-9 months | Differentiates primary caregiver from others |
| 9-12 months | Combines related objects |
| 15-18 months | Begins to spontaneously cluster objects that share physical or functional similarities; matches objects with relational parts (round lid on tea pot) |
| 16-19 months | Discriminates circle and square on formboard |
| 24-27 months | Matches objects by color, shape and size; Recognizes part/whole relationships (can identify parts and the objects with which they go); discriminates size (can nest four cups) |
| 24-36 months | Discriminates circle, square triangle; Matches object to picture of the object; Matches picture of object to another picture of object |
| 30-33 months | Matches object that have the same function (comb and brush) |
| 36-48 months | Can sort one criterion (shape or color) without getting confused |
ONE-TO-ONE CORRESPONDENCE
| Age attained | Milestones |
|---|---|
| 24-36 months | Can count by rote to five; Understands concept of one; Can count two or three object |
| 36-48 months | Can count up to five objects |
SEQUENCING ABILITIES (SEE EARLY OBJECT USE FOR EARLY SEQUENCING ABILITIES)
| Age attained | Milestones |
|---|---|
| 36-42 months | Understands big, little |
| 36-48 months | Understands questions about what is going to happen next |
| 36-52 months | Understands tall, short |
Taken from Linder, T (1993) Transdisciplinary Play-Based Assessment (TPBA), Revised.
Some Cognitive Attainments of Infancy
| Approximate Age | Exploration/Problem Solving | Object Concept | Imitation | Birth-1 month | Newborn reflexes; Exploration with limited motor skills such as head turning and sucking | Awareness of size and shape constancy | Imitation of adults’ facial features |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-4 months | Exploration with better coordinated motor skills, such as kicking, reaching and grasping; Limited anticipation of events | Use of motion and spatial arrangements to identify objects; Some awareness of object permanence | Deferred imitation of adult facial expressions - after 24 hours |
| 4-8 months | Exploration using wellcoordinated reaching, grasping, swiping, banging and other manual behaviors | Use of shape, texture and color to identify objects | Deferred imitation of adults’ actions on objects after 24 hours |
| 8-12 months | Intentional, or goal-directed behavior; Improved anticipation of events; Problem solving by analogy to other similar problems | Ability to retrieve an object from the first location in which it is hidden | _ |
| 12-18 months | Exploration of objects by action on them in novel ways; Experimenting with actions when solving problems | Ability to search in several locations for a hidden object (A-B Search) | Deferred imitation across changes in context and after one to several months |
| 18- 24 months | Sudden solutions to problems without overt experimentation with actions | Ability to find an object moved while out of sight (invisible displacement) | Imitation of actions an adult tries to produce, even if these are not fully realized; Deferred imitation of everyday behavior in makebelieve play |
| Approximate Age | Cognitive Attainment |
|---|---|
| 2-4 years | Shows dramatic
increase in representational activity, as reflected in the development of
language, make-believe, drawing, and understanding dual representation Takes the perspective of others in simplified, familiar situations and in everyday, face-toface communication Distinguishes animate being from inanimate objects; Denies that magic alters everyday experiences Grasps conservation, notices transformation (reasons by analogy about physical changes), and gives logical causal explanations in simplified familiar contexts Sorts familiar objects into hierarchically organized categories Devises ideas about underlying characteristics (not just perceptual features) that category members share |
Berk, L. (2003) Child Development, Sixth Edition.
| Approximate Age | Memory |
|---|---|
| 0-3 months | Alternates glance
between two visual stimuli Begins to associate environmental cures (Expects to be fed when held in feeding position) Recognizes parent |
| 3-6 months | Adjusts behavior
to visual, positional, or auditory cues (becomes alert upon hearing footsteps) Recognizes familiar object Makes anticipatory adjustment to being lifted |
| 6-9 months | Anticipates
when parent is leaving Waits for next step in routine Waves and looks responsively |
| 9-12 months | Abandons goal
when directed (plays with string attached to toy out of reach) Anticipates daily routine Readies in response to visual or verbal cue Shows surprise |
| 12-15 months | Maintains goal without being distracted |
| 15-18 months | Performs daily
routines Anticipates routine for future events |
| 18-24 months | Keeps goal in
mind while shifting locations Uses environmental cues to anticipate future events Observes ongoing activities and recreates them later Avoids dangerous objects Expresses expectancy of an event Increases memory of location |
| 24-30 months | Can think about
past events Requests distant and absent objects Uses more subtle environmental cues to anticipate future events Recalls and repeats fragments of songs Follows two part direction |
| 30-36 months | Remembers ideas
for play Repeats two digit sequence Can dual focus Recalls and repeats simple songs Reconstructs social sequence appropriately at a later time (picks up phone, says hello, and calls for adult) |
| Approximate Age | Causality |
|---|---|
| 0-3 months | Cries as a signal Smiles contingently Repeats movements which are self pleasing Seeks sound/vision relationship Bats at objects, first accidentally and then with intent |
| 3-6 months | Acts directly
on objects to create outcomes (shakes, bangs) Attempts to engage adult when adult face is still and expressionless Perceives that another person can produce stimulation (laughs when tickled) Uses a variety of behaviors to engage others Causes actions that seem likely to continue interesting or pleasing displays |
| 6-9 months | Uses behavior
to have an interesting event repeated Attends to consequences of actions with interest Shows interest in how things work (looks for bell) Demonstrates definite attention |
| 9-12 months | Uses gestures
to gain attention of another person or make a request Uses objects to get adult attention Demonstrates interest in the actions of objects Repeats behavior to get a response |
| 12-15 months | Attempts to
activate a simple mechanism Uses adults as a means (brings wind up toy to adult) Uses purposeful gestures to make wants known |
| 15-18 months | Uses adults
as means Knows causes for actions exist outside himself (Lets ball roll down an incline) |
| 18-24 months | Uses others
as human means (directs adult hand) Gives directives to adults Approximates reactivation of objects Infers a cause, given its effect (seeks source of rolled ball) Begins to anticipate the outcome of an action |
| 24-30 months | Requests that
actions be instigated Recognizes operations of an increasing variety of mechanisms Reconstructs operational sequence at a later time to operate a toy Shows increasing capacity to infer a cause, given only its effects Shows increasing capacity to foresee an effect, given a cause Relates one experience to another using “if/then” logic |
| 30-36 months | Uses adults
as a resource when independent attempt fails Recognizes operation of an increasing variety of mechanisms Understands natural consequences |
Taken from Kusmierek, A., et al (1995). Birth to Three Sequenced Team Assessment Resource.
| Functional Emotional Developmental Level | Examples of Importance for Early Learning and Academic Skills |
|---|---|
| Level 1 Shared attention and Regulation (Begins at 0-3 months) |
Necessary for attention to sights and sounds and, later, to words, letters, numbers, etc. |
| Level 2 Engagement and Relating (Begins at 2-6 months) |
Necessary for engaging with the world (not being self-absorbed), learning about “reality,” and mastering all cognitive skills. |
| Level 3 Two-Way Purposeful Emotional Interactions (Begins at 4-9 months) |
Necessary for “cause-and-effect” preverbal and verbal thinking and high level of logical thinking. |
| Level 4 Shared Social Problem Solving (Begins at 9-18 months) |
Necessary for:
|
| Level 5 Creating Ideas (Begins at 18-30 months) |
Necessary for forming and using symbols in language, reading, math, planning, and problem solving |
| Level 6 Building Bridges Between ideas: Logical Thinking (Begins at 30-48 months) |
Necessary for
all learning, including:
|
| Level 7 Multi-Cause, Comparative, Thinking (Begins at 4-6 years [48-72 months]) |
Levels 7-9 are
necessary for al learning, including:
|
| Level 8 Emotionally differentiated gray-area thinking (Begins at 6-10 years) |
Being able to construct patterns of ideas at progressively higher levels of creativity and logic. |
| Level 9 Intermittent reflective thinking, a stable sense of self, and an internal standard (Begins at 9-12 years and beyond) |
Self evaluative thinking evidenced in analyzing one’s own or another person’s oral or written communication, considering different options, creating “experiments” to prove or disprove a hypothesis, and using judgment. |
| Age and Level | Examples of Auditory Processing and Language Skills |
|---|---|
| 0-3 months Shared Attention and Regulation |
Attends to the
world of speech sounds and their production, e.g.,
|
| 2-6 months Engagement and Relating |
Synchronous
sound productions with increasing capacity to:
|
| 4-9 months Two-Way Purposeful Emotional Interactions |
Reciprocal exchange
of expanding sound productions, e.g.,
|
| 9-18 months Shared Social Problem Solving |
Increasing reciprocal
use of vocal patterns, including words, e.g.,
Beginning comprehension of spoken language. For all, but specifically for math: Coordinates touching and quantifying to judge specific quantity |
| 18-30 months Creating Ideas |
Combining words
into ideas Begins to form visual images for word meanings. Increasing comprehension of spoken language and, eventually, complex ideas. |
| 30- 48 months Building Bridges Between Ideas: Logical Thinking |
Exchanging ideas
(e.g., why, how, when, etc.) Perceives the parts/whole concepts of sound patterns in words (e.g., syllables) both receptively and expressively. |
| 4-6 years
[48-72 months] Multi-Cause, comparative, thinking |
Begins to connect
sounds (duration, pitch, and elements) and expressively. Begins to connect sounds, words and shapes, including letters, e.g.,
|
| 4-6 Years
[48-72 months] Multi-Cause, Comparative, Thinking |
Names and identifies sounds and letters of alphabet in and out of sequence (for all, but specifically for reading and language arts) Between 4 – 5 years: Begins to integrate awareness of auditory, visual, and motor components of speech sounds and place and manner of articulation. 5 years (60 months) on: Becomes aware of nature of errors enabling monitoring and self-correction (for all, but specifically for reading and language arts) For all, but specifically for reading comprehension: Comprehension of written language as reading ability develops |
“Mounting research supports the importance of the infant and young child’s ability to discriminate and recognize sound patterns, and later the identity, number, and order of individual sounds within words, as the basis for reading and spelling (Calfee, Lindamood, & Lindamood, 1973; Shankweiler & Liberman, 1989; Heilman, Voeller, & Alexander, 1996; Lindamood & Lindamood, 2005.)” ICDL-DMIC Pg 174
| Visuospatial
Capacities Indicate the overall capacity for expected age levels (Note that Year 1 is actually birth to first year, Year 2 is firstbirthday to second birthday, and so on) |
|---|
1. Body Awareness
and Sense
|
| 2. Location
of the Body in Space Involves location of own body parts in relationship to each other, location of body as a whole in its immediate surroundings; and location of the body in terms of the broader environment.
|
3. Relation
of Objects to Self and Other Objects and People
|
4. Conservation
of Space
|
5. Visual
Logical Reasoning
|
6. Representational
Thought (Drawing, Thinking, Visualizing)
|
“Visuospatial capacities are often attended to in considering early learning and academic skills, but not in the sufficient depth or scope required for a full understanding of their importance. For example, understanding math even at its most elementary level of addition and subtraction requires comprehending one-to-one correspondence. This means that the child doesn’t simply count, but can match the number he says to the number of objects he sees in front of him, and can manipulate these objects and see how a change in their pattern would relate to a change in the number he applies to them.” ICDL-DMIC Pg 177
Sensory Over-Responsivity
| Suggested Observation |
|---|
| Visual Domain Complex, cluttered, moving, novel, and/or high intensity visual stimuli over-excite, anger or overwhelm Wears sunglasses or caps all the time |
| Tactile Domain Consistently over-responsive to touch (pulls body part away when touched); discomfort when people too close Over-sensitive to certain types of clothing (e.g. labels, long/short sleeves, certain fabrics) or activities of daily living (e.g. hair or hand-washing, bathing) |
| Vestibular/Proprioceptive
Domain Avoids/becomes upset in certain positions (e.g., prone, upside down) or uneven surfaces Uncomfortable, insecure when walking with others who may push them |
| Visceral
Responses Does the child need to go to the bathroom frequently? Does the child’s body go still or seem to shut down when he has an emotional reaction? Shows somatic symptoms indicating physiological over-reactivity (e.g., irritable bowel syndrome, migraines, constant stomach aches) |
| General Shows overt signs of ‘fight, flight or freeze’ when presented with particular sensory stimuli; may seem irritable, avoidant Withdraws from/tries to escape a toy or sensory input |
“Children who are extremely visually over-responsive sometimes find the contrast between dark print on a white page too dramatic and find it difficult to focus in on individual letters, syllables, words or phrases. Over-responsivity to sounds can contribute to making it difficult for some children to discriminate sound patterns and, therefore, connect sounds to letters and eventually words.” ICDL- DMIC Pg 178
| Suggested Observations |
|---|
| Fails to attends
or orient to salient stimuli. Fails to responds to name when occupied; overly absorbed. Shuts down; stops interacting. Overly focused to some stimuli (e.g., blinking lights, moving wheels). Investigates new object only briefly; fails to engage. Shows no or limited response to an obnoxious sounding toy. Fails to orient to sounds as expected. Lacks awareness of bodily sensations. |
“ Children who are under-responsive to sensation such as sound, sight, and touch may tend toward self-absorption (e.g., the teacher’s voice doesn’t attract their attention) and find it hard to listen or follow directions. In the extreme, self-absorption can compromise attention to the outside world and, therefore, comprehension of reality and logic (e.g., the child escapes into fantasy).” ICDL-DMIC Pg 179
| Suggested Observations |
|---|
| Seeks high intensity
input in activity; appears unable to get enough; engages with high energy. Resists moving from high intensity activity; resists increasing complexity of activity. Child seems unaware of potential danger or pain, or the consequences of their actions. Increasing sensory input results in increasing impulsivity, behavioral disorganization. Responses to input escalate, behavior gets out of control. |
| Suggested Observations |
|---|
| Auditory Fails to orients to most sounds (loud/soft) when otherwise engaged. Does not discriminate name from background noise. |
| Visual Shows inadequate eye-hand coordination: ability to visually anticipate object movement. Fails to scan environment and spot what looking for in near or far space. Fails to show age-appropriate figure-ground skills. |
| Vestibular/Proprioception Cannot sense direction of movement in space, eyes open and closed. Does not change planes of movement in play. Shows inappropriate postural and balance reactions in response to movement. Poor awareness of movement makes safety a concern. |
| Tactile/Kinesthetic Cannot identify objects by feel. Unaware of location of bump/bruise; identifies finger touched, vision occluded. Senses if socks twisted, shoes on wrong foot, hair needs combing, fingers in wrong place in gloves Fails to actively explore tactile characteristics of objects. |
| Olfactory
and Gustatory Cannot identify typical smells and tastes. Has specific preference for different foods for his age (spicy, “pop rocks”). |
| Proprioceptive Does not investigate objects with in hand manipulation or adjust to qualities of materials. Poorly grades movements and applies inappropriate force. Cannot feel where feet/body are without looking. |
“Discrimination
requires higher level of cognitive functions than modulation and is not automatic.”
ICDL-DMIC Pg 295
The ability to distinguish shapes or letters, and follow through with tasks
or directions may be difficult for a child with discrimination difficulties.
| Suggested Observations |
|---|
| Cannot stabilize
posture when challenged; sitting on stable or dynamic (unstable) surfaces. Difficulty maintaining postural alignment and stability when standing/sitting at desk or in chair completing table top tasks. Does not automatically use non-dominant hand to assist dominant hand in fine motor tasks. Difficulty maintaining postural alignment and balance while moving body. Difficulty with equilibrium, rotation, weight shift, crossing midline. Difficulty with stability on different surfaces e.g., climbing, walking on foam, walking on moving surfaces. Difficulty with bilateral symmetrical activities. Difficulty with bilateral reciprocal movements. Muscle tone and strength insufficient to accomplish antigravity activities and functional movement. Facial expressions fixed during posturally challenging activities. Difficulty with near/far gaze shift. Does not have developmentally expected physical fitness as evidenced by endurance, strength measures. |
| Suggested Observations |
|---|
| Has difficulty
with action-based problem solving. Can figure out what to do but has trouble with how to do it. Appears clumsy and awkward in gross and/or fine motor tasks. Has difficulty with motor imitation. Unable to take small parts to make a whole. Difficulty replicating space and form in 2D and 3D constructions. Does not show joy in success; not motivated to persist with somewhat difficult activities requiring active problem solving. Does not initiate activities, or initiates only when activity is familiar, or is he/she able to initiate creative and novel play. Is inefficient, ineffective in reaching goal of activity. Pace/rate of activity is not age-appropriate. Difficulty adapting to changes in task demand, new task demand, or novel situation. Difficulty sequencing tasks in an age appropriate manner. Talks self through motor sequences; tries to get out of doing by talking. |